所有美好的东西

之前对本片期待很大，其中很重要的一个原因就是主演有瑞恩·高斯林，太喜欢他演的《充气娃娃之恋》，加上这个故事感觉也挺不错，相信他演来应该会挺靠谱，看了影片之后，感觉果然如此，两位主演都有着不错的发挥，只是故事略微生涩了点，显得不是那么紧凑而吸引人，如果能静下心来看，还是一部挺好的片子，尤其喜欢那一股80年代的怀旧风。。

He is a child until his father’s death. His life marked as he is 9 years old, after watching his mother death. It is like he never grows up and become who he is right now. He blames all of it to his father. From that moment on, he does everything against his father’s wish. Such as always late; bring first met Katie to his family party; even married to Katie is after talked between his father and him.(She is never belong to us. Isn’t it good…); they move from Vermont to NYC, after his father talked to him. One thing interesting in film, his father said why Katie with him is she want to live a better life, not now, most important thing he said, she is like your mother. HE look over her again, I think the answer is yes.On the other hand, he is afraid of his father too. He also wants to make proud of his father. If one thing is against David wish, but he can’t said no. There is a thing become grown in his heart which makes his character more twisted and lost control…Katie and he might be really loves each other. But the love it’s different from each other. David love Katie is like she gave him mother-like feelings. Like he said, she loves everything you like that she didn’t like. She gave him unselfish love, although she knew there is something wrong with David more than one times. She is still with him. On David comprehensive, this love should obey him, Katie like his privacy. He can’t stand someone steals it, which means the boat far away from the shore; Katie wants to go a medical school... Why Katie loves him so much, I didn’t see so much that she look on David‘s money. Maybe they have the same childhood; David just gave her the pure love. Although ten years past, she still felt that David loves her so much. But the way of love changed and twisted. Two weak people but really matched!David is under the edge of lose control…The climax of this film is the talk between David and his father. He finally got the answer of why he became like this. The childhood nightmare always like devil follows him, change him, and make him. Then finally cleared, but it’s too late. He still is a child, play disappearing game with everyone. He might be thought it’s a excellent revenge. But he knew he left something…At the end of visiting his dying father, David said I miss her so much. I think most of her is said Katie and some of said his mother. In David subconscious, Katie is his mother. He gave her violence death like his father gave her mother. But after his father death, he feels free eventually. All good things come to an end, but happened before...

一见钟情的戴维和凯瑟琳，在他们刚开始时他们笑的那么开心，他们那么幸福，阳光是和煦的，生活是简单的，也是容易得到满足的。

这样一个蜜月，正如他们的小店名字，是他们在一起的时光里最美好的一段。

但随着戴维父亲的一次到访，在听了父亲的一句话：“这真的是她想要的吗”之后，戴维开始思考现在的生活，他意识到凯瑟琳其实不是喜欢简单乡村生活的人，她更向往大都市热闹的生活，她之所以愿意这样，完全是一种为了爱人所做的牺牲。

戴维不想这么自私，他决定回去工作。

他们回到纽约，他们买了大宅子，他们周末办热闹的聚会。

凯瑟琳喜欢这样的生活，戴维原来的朋友也喜欢凯瑟琳，甚至让人觉得戴维被冷落。

这不难理解，戴维本来就是安静的人，此时他重返纽约，迁就着妻子，听名于父亲，满心的积郁无处发泄，所以会慢慢变得沉默，变得暴躁，变得不可理喻。

最终“酿成悲剧”。

说真的，片子没有戴维杀死凯瑟琳的镜头。

我不愿意相信戴维是凶手，我更愿意相信凯瑟琳真的踏上火车去了异乡。

好吧，戴维就是那个神经病凶手。

他怎么会如此脆弱，他为什么如此懦弱，也许是因为他遭受了幼时亲眼目睹母亲死亡的过程的打击，也许是他父亲从小对他过于强势的钳制，也许是他为爱牺牲太多，而自己想要的一直得不到满足，还可能是因为他一时的抑郁的得不到排遣，一时情绪的失控。

所有这些，造就了戴维和凯瑟琳的悲剧。

时光不可逆，戴维德父亲是个成功的商人，但他还是安排戴维站在了母亲自杀的现场，他还是按自己的意愿安排着戴维的生活，没有尽力弥补戴维失去母亲的痛苦。

凯瑟琳则过高估计了戴维的承受能力。

戴维则在糟糕的情绪里沉沦，意识到自己的情绪不对时也没有寻求帮助或是自助。

我想到柴静在她的书里写到的对药家鑫父亲的采访片段，药父一直很自责，责怪自己军人出身，责怪自己对药家鑫管教过严，使药家鑫走向了极端。

戴维和药家鑫都是脆弱的人，当他们的刚性得不到发挥时，他们才会走向极端。

因为心里有问题就可以这样对待自己最爱的人么爱情的美好都不能把他变回正常人 活着也是浪费啊真是非常喜欢他们当初相爱的时光 喜欢那个男人告诉他的朋友 他的妻子是完美的 我做什么他都喜欢 都支持 真是不敢想象后来揪住妻子头发野蛮的施暴也是同一个他。

不明白这究竟是为什么，或许是电影与想象中的相比太过不美好，或许是我还年轻，或许是自己深深的迷失在了这算不上惊悚也算不上悬疑的片子里，或许还有许许多多的理由，有许许多多的不解。

或许……抱歉，我不知道我到底在说些什么……剧情就不说了，看了自然明白，不看也没有什么可惜而言……因为看了《蓝色情人节》，一个在我心里彻头彻尾的悲剧，喜欢瑞恩高斯林的沉默与厚重。

因为看了《夜访吸血鬼》惊叹于邓斯特的表演张力与其年轻的脸上自然流露的沧桑。

坦白说，看这部片子，主要原因也就是这两位主演了罢。

All good things都会因为记忆亦或是期待而消失，我哀叹年轻、美丽和爱的流逝，沉默于罪恶的脱逃。

只是，那些曾经的阳光与微笑依然会荡漾你我的心房。

如果你想思索，如果你想尝试，看过影片，就将那些值得记忆的美好可在脑海里吧！

总之，心有爱，美好，不好，一切都还会存在

戴维的爸爸让戴维亲眼目睹了戴维的妈妈自杀的过程，因为他以为这样能阻止自杀。

因为这件事，戴维在桌子底下躲了一个礼拜，心中也积下了一团生命的阴影，并留下了紧张时自言自语的毛病。

戴维想做自己，不参与家族生意，与一见钟情的凯蒂恋爱并结婚。

可是因为那团阴影的存在，他被爸爸说服结束了逍遥的生活，加入到家族生意中来。

他想给凯蒂富裕自由的生活，却并不知道这并不是凯蒂真正在乎的。

同样因为那阴影的存在，戴维此生不想要孩子，他说服凯蒂做了人流。

凯蒂因此就像死过一次一样，在心灵上留下了一块很大的创伤。

工作时的戴维永远都像一个醉汉，离真实的自己越来越远，离那个热爱生活喜欢自由的戴维越来越远。

在没有告诉戴维的情况下，凯蒂报考了医学院，戴维因此感觉凯蒂在逃离，自己让凯蒂失望了。

在凯蒂妈妈的家里，戴维第一次用暴力对待凯蒂，因为他想回家，凯蒂却不顺从。

戴维和凯蒂相爱，却并不了解真正的彼此，不了解彼此内心积压的过往心事。

戴维只是在尽力承担自以为的一个丈夫的责任，同时因为过于担心失去而过于敏感，不能忍受任何轻微的意料之外的改变。

在这种巨大的压力下，心灵越发的变形，那团阴影越发的强大，成为一股强大的力量以暴力的形式操纵着失控的戴维，让他去结束他不想看到的一切。

戴维一直生活在恐惧里，随着生活的积压，这恐惧变得异常难以控制。

于是，戴维杀死了自己的妻子，利用他人杀死了知道真相的朋友，又杀死了自己利用的人。

所有美好的东西都再也找不到了，剩下的只是形同躯壳的苍老的戴维。

影片很好的表现了戴维蜕变的过程，每一处转折都精彩动人。

省去杀人的过程，只展示前因和后果，让人真切的感受到那股恐惧的强大力量，以及人性扭曲后的丑陋和阴暗。

和戴维形成对比的是凯蒂，如果说戴维代表了人性中的丑陋，凯蒂则能代表些许美好。

只是凯蒂也是脆弱的，她没能拯救戴维，相反自己也被吞噬。

这是一个关于恶魔的故事，但同时也是一个令人惋惜令人心疼的故事。

人类的历史上有很多这样丑陋的伤疤，作为后人，我们唯一能做的就是尽力散发心中所有的爱，让美好的爱强大到融化所有的脆弱和阴暗，让爱变成永久的阳光，没有迷雾，没有黑夜！

On the scene in the opening credits when a young Durst shoots a toy gun at his mom:"I did like guns when I was a little kid, I remember that."On meeting Kathie’s family:"That is one of the major regrets in my life, is the way I treated her family, her mother. They’d never met anything like me before, this guy with piles of money and terrible manners. I used to feed the dog while I was sitting at the table. I used to talk about making love to Kathie at the dining-room table in front of her mother. [I was] absolutely impossible."On why Kathie’s family paid for the wedding, despite the Dursts’ enormous wealth:"The bride’s family pays for the wedding."On his shock that Kathie was accepted to the Albert Einstein School of Medicine:"I just didn’t think she would be accepted. I thought that if she was accepted to medical school, it would be one of the lesser-rated schools. My shock was somewhat tempered … [since] the reason she got accepted at Albert Einstein was because my grandfather was a founder of Albert Einstein."On his refusal to help pay for Kathie’s school, and the cancellation of her credit cards:"I was always, always, always very controlling. In terms of the stuff that’s out there — that I tried to get her out of medical school, that I wouldn’t pay her tuition — I wouldn’t pay her tuition because she’d hired lawyers, my lawyer insisted that I don't pay for anything that I hadn’t paid for in the past, and she’d gone and done one of those federal programs where they pay for it and you take a loan. The lawyer said, 'Don’t pay for the medical school.'""Yes, I cancelled her credit card and took her off the bank account, but she had her own bank account and I didn’t want her on mine, or I guess I was told that she shouldn’t be on [my] credit card — she could get her own credit cards.""She never filed for divorce. She wanted a child, to have children, and she wanted me to not always be the dominant one, to not always make all the decisions in the marriage."On the scene where Gosling’s character storms into Dunst’s graduation party and pulls her out by her hair:"This is close. After a number of years, before, where we would go to her family’s house for a function, I would insist that we agree on how long we are going to stay: two hours, three hours, four hours. We would always do a negotiation, and when the time was up, I was ready to leave.""I’ve seen the story about the hair two different ways. One way, I drag her out of the house by her hair; the other way, I grab her hair and a big chunk comes out. Either way is close enough."On the scene in which Dunst’s character seeks refuge in a neighbor’s apartment in the midst of a fight with Gosling’s character:Durst: This is more or less accurate. I don’t know why she would go in our neighbor’s window as opposed to go to their door. But it was pouring, and we were having a wrestling, shoving-type fight, and she ran out on the terrace and ran into their apartment. Said she was afraid to come home. [I] said, "She doesn’t want to come home, she doesn’t have to come home."Jarecki: Did you feel like she was really afraid to come home?Durst: I’ve got no idea. I didn’t really care one way or another what she did. It was late and I was just tired."On the part where Dunst’s character discovers Gosling’s character killed Igor, the family dog:Durst: This made me feel bad about the movie, Andrew. I mean, the idea that I could kill Igor, I don’t like.Jarecki: Well, there was a lot of discussion about you having had a lot of dogs over the years, a bunch of [which] were named Igor. Someone said to us at one point that you had seven dogs over ten years or something."Durst: No. We had two Igors before the Igor that lasted forever. One of them got run over, and one of them, when he was a puppy, went out and … ate an apple core. The apple core got stuck in his gut. We did an operation on him, and he died.On his relationship with Morris Black:Durst: [In Galveston, I] didn’t know anybody there to begin with, and when I left, I didn’t know anybody but Morris Black. And we were both loners and had some strange things in common and didn’t do much. There’s not that much to do in Galveston, anyway, but whatever it was, we did it. Went to some movies. Saw Traffic.Jarecki: The movie Traffic?Durst: Yes, the movie Traffic.Jarecki: You didn’t just sit and watch traffic.Durst: [Laughing] There wasn’t even much traffic in Galveston.On Morris Black’s death and dismemberment:"I remember it very, very, very clearly, and I remember the nightmare I went through over the next several days trying to decide what to do, deciding I could not go to the police, the police aren’t going to believe this, nobody’s going to believe that I came down here to Galveston a rich guy, rented a $300-a-month apartment disguised as a woman, and oh, by the way, my neighbor is lying in my kitchen with a shot in the face from my gun …""They never found the head. I have no idea why. I do know that there must have been 15 garbage bags full of body parts and other stuff with blood on it or whatever, and they found 12. Why they didn’t find the other ones, since they were all dumped in the same place, I have no idea."

从电影的创作背景中得知《所有美好的东西》片名是来自真实故事中的营养店，故事的开始很美好，it seems that everything is perfect.影片想呈现给观众的是失踪和谋杀的悬疑故事，所以我想“所有美好的东西”是省略了其背后鲜血淋漓的画面和恐怖心理活动的标题。

美好的东西背后，隐藏了令人毛骨悚然的不堪。

看到后面才发现这部影片更应该是一部心理题材的影片，对男主角审讯的过程 就是对他做心理剖析的过程。

男主人公是由于童年阴影而落下精神分裂症吧，从她抓起妻子头发一把拉她上车那一刻起，我就觉得女主角难逃厄运。

假如有那么一天病发，一定会接二连三地伤害身边的人，因为他已经陷入了连锁反应当中。

学士帽满天飞，凯蒂学医归来，表面上是好事，当大家都为毕业的妻子毕业欢呼时，戴维坐在凳子上的那个镜头让我很毛，它暗示了“好事不断”……之后就是磅礴大雨的半夜凯蒂湿透了全身拼命敲邻居的窗户呼救。。。

这些最后都随她的失踪而去成为一个谜。

每件好事都遮盖了将要来临的悲剧，我们不能总是被生活上演的障眼法所蒙蔽了。

也许是从心理学角度我读出这部电影的涵义。

戴维对凯蒂有爱，“I did realy miss her”表明了他这般爱她至死的感情，但不可否认他是个week man. 戴维告诉她：Just go home.& I promise…貌似最后都不能handle他自己的情绪。

我想谜团答案有2：凯蒂被自己的丈夫因精神病而杀害了：凯蒂自己逃得远远的，像结局那样，只是失踪罢了，至少还活命。

鉴于前面已经死了这么多人还加一条狗，第一个解释更合理让人信服。

这就是美好的生活背后，每个人多有不同程度的心理疾病，有的问题很小不足以影响正常生活，而被人们逃避了，比如怕黑的人们就尽量不让自己留在黑的地方，而不会把自己一个放在黑漆漆的空旷房间来面对它。

当问题严重到面对它也不能好好释怀的时候，悲剧已经发生了。

正如戴维的心理阴影已经成为定时炸弹多年了，线也老化，无论剪断那一条，最终都会引爆。

纽约房地产亿万大富豪罗伯特 – 德斯特（Robert Durst ）的第一任妻子凯思林于1982年1月底神秘失踪。

当时他们夫妇正闹离婚纠纷。

凯思林失踪的前一天晚上，正在参加一个舞会，突然接到德斯特的电话。

她接完电话对好友吉尔伯特说：我必须赶回家去，“万一我发生了什末不测，一定要为我查明真相，好吗？

我真担心德斯特会做出什末疯狂举动”。

四天后，德斯特报警，说凯思林失踪。

凯的朋友们无不对德斯特严重怀疑，但是警方始终没有查出线索。

2000年，警方联络上凯斯林的好友女作家苏珊 – 伯曼，要苏珊协助调查。

苏珊曾向德斯特询问凯思林失踪的问题。

其后，德斯特给苏珊寄过两张支票，每张金额2 . 5万美元，德解释说是“送礼”。

2000年12月11日，苏珊突然在家中被人枪杀。

警方勘察，没有破门而入的痕迹，子弹又是从脑后射入苏珊头颅，所以判断是被苏珊认识的熟人所杀，并认为德斯特有重大嫌疑。

德斯特没有充分理由解释为什末给苏珊寄支票，也被怀疑是为了“封”苏珊的口。

2001年9月30日，德克萨斯州加尔维斯顿市的海滩上发现一具没有头和四肢的躯干。

转天，同一水域捞起两只袋子，一只装着一条人腿，一只装着两支胳臂。

同时，警方还从水底捞出一只装着钢锯的塑料套，一张从当地五金店购买塑料袋的购物单，一件衣服，一张报纸。

警方很快查出，死者是失踪的71岁老人莫里斯–布莱克。

警方在搜查布莱克住所时发现，有一道血迹一直延伸到布莱克邻居“德洛西 –辛娜”的房间。

在对“辛娜”家进行搜查时，搜出一双血淋林的靴子和一把刀。

据此深入追查，查明真正的“辛娜”，是德斯特的同学，并不在德克萨斯州居住。

而假“辛娜”正是德斯特男扮女装冒充的。

警方立即逮扑了德斯特。

警方审讯过程中，德斯特在铁证面前，承认了杀死和肢解布莱克的罪行。

他交代，男扮女装冒充“辛娜”到德克萨斯州居住，是因为前妻失踪和苏珊被杀，他被怀疑，而进行逃避。

他说，不是有意杀死布莱克。

起因是，布莱克性情暴躁，两人经常争吵，有时还大打出手（此一情节有人证明）。

2001年9月28日，他发现布莱克进入他的住房，手持他的枪。

两人扭打过程中，枪走了火，射中布莱克脸部致死。

他“吓坏了，害怕警方不相信他所说的经过”，所以肢解尸体，抛尸灭迹。

法院审讯时，检察官按“谋杀罪”提起公诉，如果罪名成立，德斯特面临99年徒刑。

陪审团经过五天审议，于2003年11月11日做出裁决，完全出乎所有人的意料，竟然是“无罪释放”。

当法庭宣判这一判决时，连德斯特本人都“吓了一跳”，嘴巴微微张开，眼睛流出泪水。

他拥抱律师说：“太谢谢你了”！

检察官听到这一判决感到惊愕，连说：“令人失望，令人沮丧！

”他认为，德斯特一贯说谎，是个“冷血杀手”；德斯特的行为用他自己的说法是无法解释的。

可惜的是，美国媒体对本案没有后续的追踪报道。

陪审团根据什末理由裁定德斯特“无罪”？

作出如此荒唐判决的原因和背景是什末？

都没有下文，也没人再追究。

这种不了了之的现象，在美国并不少见。

除了反映美国司法制度和司法工作存在严重弊端，也反映美国的新闻自由并不是像某些人吹嘘或想象的那样完美。

“家丑不可外扬”和“为富者讳”的现象在美国不是不存在。

之前很喜欢蜘蛛女的街拍，没想到她能拍一个这么。。

怎么说。。

文艺？？

小资？？

的片子。。

这个可以发展。。

我唯一想说的就是当我第一眼看到高斯林的女装我以为那就是个女人！！！！

看来的确是有些面部女性特征。。